Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the frontend design comparison test (Dune House landing page), Sonnet consumed approximately twice as many tokens as GPT-6.1 Sol (Sol used approximately 10,090 tokens)
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/30/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/29/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSonnet 5.5 runs at approximately twice the speed of GPT-6.1 Sol78% similarUnverifiedGPT-4.1 Sol reads an average of approximately 110,000 tokens per request, while Sonnet 5 requires 360,000 tokens.77% similarUnverifiedIn the test, GPT-6.1 Sol's input tokens were 6.8 million (of which 6.6 million were cached), with output tokens of 68,000.69% similarUnverifiedIn the same Three.js 3D modeling task test, GPT-6.1 Sol and Sonnet 5.5 produced output of comparable quality, but the equivalent API cost differed by approximately 30 times.69% similarUnverifiedIn the DeepSWE 1.1 benchmark, GPT-6.1 Sol scored 75.2%, Astra scored 74.8%, Cloud Sonnet 5.5 scored 71.0%, and GPT-6 Sol scored a top of 68.8%.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/963237API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/963237MCP
get_claim(id=963237)