Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
High accuracy in LLM evaluations may be a product of information leakage rather than genuine reasoning ability, a problem that is especially pronounced in structured scientific data such as CIF files, which simultaneously contain multiple attribute fields.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedLLMs have a strong tendency toward error tolerance and completion, and when faced with misaligned table data they typically do not report errors but instead produce seemingly reasonable inferences based on the erroneous data.72% similarUnverifiedAbsence verification requires the model to actively infer which important information that should have appeared in the source material was omitted, necessitating the prior construction of a complete mental model of what ought to be present, which is far more difficult for LLMs.69% similarUnverifiedLLM生成的虚假学术引用往往具有极高的可信外观，作者名、期刊名、年份、标题都遵循合理的分布，但组合结果可能从未真实存在69% similarUnverifiedLLMs perform reliably in high-recall screening tasks such as title-abstract screening and full-text screening, but show a marked decline in evidence extraction tasks and still require human leadership.68% similarUnverifiedIn document information extraction scenarios, downstream systems can only make decisions about whether human review is needed when the confidence scores are genuinely trustworthy.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/963964API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/963964MCP
get_claim(id=963964)