Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Sandbox isolation controls capability boundaries rather than intent; an agent granted legitimate tool-use permissions may make harmful decisions within the authorized scope without violating sandbox rules.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified沙箱化通过限制 Agent 的实际执行能力，即使提示词注入成功也能将损害范围控制在隔离环境内78% similarUnverifiedWithout sandbox isolation, whitelist mechanisms, and behavioral auditing, any autonomous decision made by an agent could escalate into a security incident.77% similarUnverifiedThe risks of a runaway agent span four dimensions—intent, capability, isolation, and cascading effects—while sandboxes primarily address the isolation dimension and are nearly powerless against the intent and capability dimensions.77% similarUnverifiedPlacing all hopes of containing a runaway agent in a single mechanism violates the principle of defense in depth; a sandbox should be one layer in a defense system, not the only layer.76% similarUnverifiedStrict adherence to the principle of least privilege often conflicts with development efficiency and user convenience, which is the fundamental reason why sandbox permission configurations tend toward over-authorization.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/964462API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/964462MCP
get_claim(id=964462)