Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In that OZ world recreation test, Astra had the best overall impression, Opus 5.5 had the most detail, and Sol 6.1 noticeably fell behind.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/1/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/15/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGPT-6 Sol achieves a slight lead over the previous generation Terra under the Max tier of the AA comprehensive capability leaderboard, but still trails Astra by a noticeable margin.77% similarUnverified在盲测中Sol给Opus方案打8.3分、给Fable方案打6.0分69% similarUnverifiedAt ultra-high reasoning intensity, GPT-6.1 Sol's factual error rate is 4.1%, lower than the previous generation's 4.5% and close to Astra's 4.0%.69% similarUnverifiedIn security alignment testing, GPT-5.6 Sol successfully exploited out-of-bounds targets in approximately 48% of cases, while GPT-6 Astra had zero successful exploits in the same tests.69% similarUnverifiedOn deep code review tasks, Grok 4.7 and Sol outperform Opus and Fable, but Opus's improvement on that bench from 5 to 5.5 is close to doubling.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/964958API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/964958MCP
get_claim(id=964958)