Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The impact of reasoning-chain corruption on final answers was relatively small (2%–30%), and only 2.9%–35.3% of support-judgment flips co-occurred with answer changes.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified当相关文档被放置在上下文中间位置时，模型正确回答率相比放在首尾位置下降高达20-30个百分点73% similarUnverifiedCorrupted reasoning chains shifted support judgments by 10%–22% under the blind-verifier prompt.73% similarUnverified斯坦福大学研究发现，在推理链关键步骤注入错误信息对最终答案的影响远小于预期73% similarUnverifiedResearch shows that in certain tasks, simply changing '请判断' to '请分析' in a prompt can cause accuracy fluctuations of 5–10 percentage points.70% similarUnverifiedIn matched comparisons, changing only the wording reversed which side of a contested issue the model supported in 16.9% of cases.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/966691API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/966691MCP
get_claim(id=966691)