Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the Terminal-Bench Core 0.1.1 pilot across 12 selected tasks, both the baseline group and the reliability-layer group each passed 17/36 under strict trials, with the reliability layer consuming 37.49% more input tokens and 50.73% more output tokens.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/2/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified在 Terminal Bench 2.1 测试中，OpenCode 对比里 89 个任务的失败数从 29 降到 16，多解决 13 题，分数提升 14.61 个百分点74% similarUnverifiedOn the Terminal Bench benchmark, a model whose underlying weights were unchanged but whose framework was improved rose in ranking from outside the top thirty to the top five.66% similarUnverifiedIn the experiments, the task resolution rate was 17% for zero-shot generation, 27% for generic self-correction, 23% for error-only feedback, and 90% for diagnostic counterexample feedback (A-CEGIS).66% similarUnverifiedA 54% improvement in token efficiency means that the number of tokens consumed to complete the same programming task is reduced by nearly half.65% similarUnverifiedIn the DeepSWE test, 99.6% of all input tokens were cache hits.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/966703API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/966703MCP
get_claim(id=966703)