Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Conditional coverage is stronger than marginal coverage, requiring that the target coverage rate be maintained for any given input condition, whereas marginal coverage only guarantees coverage in an expected sense across all test samples.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/5/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified高覆盖率是测试有效性的必要条件而非充分条件，100%覆盖率不保证测试断言足够严格74% similarUnverifiedContext optimization should be treated as a trade-off problem with explicit coverage constraints, rather than purely a compression problem.71% similarUnverified路径覆盖（Path Coverage）是白盒测试中覆盖强度最高的标准之一，高于语句覆盖和分支覆盖，但路径数量可能随嵌套条件呈指数级增长69% similarUnverifiedThe study adopted a confidence-interval-aware qualification rule, meaning a configuration passes only when its lower confidence bound genuinely exceeds the threshold τ.66% similarUnverifiedCoverage metrics measure how many components were checked but cannot reflect the actual consequences produced by an operation or its consumers, and may therefore conceal failures on critical paths65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/975955API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/975955MCP
get_claim(id=975955)