Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The team's current best model achieves a macro-averaged F1 of approximately 0.73 on the comprehensive test set, slightly above the team's internal acceptance threshold of 0.7.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/6/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/20/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAccording to the MedViT paper, the model achieved a Macro F1 score of 0.7791 on ChestX-ray1471% similarUnverifiedCriticGen's F1 scores on criteria-based rationales and actionable suggestions improved from 0.6369/0.5994 to 0.7554/0.7900, respectively.71% similarUnverifiedGVD achieves an F1 score of 0.97 for version family construction and an F1 score of 0.94 for rule-level consistency.69% similarUnverifiedMDT achieved a macro-averaged F1 of 0.7408 on the labeled test set of the BAH dataset in the 3rd ABAW Challenge, and a Macro F1 of 0.7368 on the private leaderboard.69% similarUnverifiedIn this task, identifying where a problem occurs (localization F1 generally above 0.78) is much easier than accurately determining the type of problem (label F1 around 0.5).67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/981641API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/981641MCP
get_claim(id=981641)