Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
In high-risk fields such as finance, healthcare, and law, it is better to decline to answer than to answer incorrectly—an AI that honestly states it needs to verify is more reliable than one that confidently provides a wrong answer.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/6/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedIn scenarios involving factual accuracy, logical rigor, and high-stakes decision-making, AI should be positioned as a tool rather than an autonomous agent to which decisions can be fully delegated, and human oversight and verification are indispensable.78% similarUnverifiedA fluent and affirmatively worded AI summary reinforces false credibility and is more readily accepted than an ambiguous report, even when the former is wrong.77% similarUnverifiedThe greatest risk in having AI agents directly answer data questions is generating answers that appear plausible but are actually incorrect.77% similarUnverified医疗AI中的选择性预测机制在低置信度时拒绝答案转介人工审核，被证明比强制输出答案更能降低临床风险76% similarUnverifiedIn high-stakes domains such as healthcare and law, the abstention capability—where the model prefers to give no answer over a wrong answer—is far more valuable than answering more questions.76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/982411API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/982411MCP
get_claim(id=982411)