[KongchangAI]
ModelLFM3 Audio 2B

Audio 2B

An audio language model in the LFM3 series that supports speech input and output as well as text generation, and provides tool-calling capability.

Timeline (last 90 days)

Nov 4

Audio 2B accepts text or speech input and outputs text, speech, or both in sync; it supports tool calling, voice chat and reasoning in 18 languages.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

Omni 2B reuses the audio components and adds a vision encoder, enabling it to process images and video, but it does not have the ability of Audio 2B to "think" before giving a text answer.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

According to data published by Liquid, Audio 2B has an English word error rate of 6.2 and a VoiceBench score of 73; Gemma 4 E4B, with about four times the parameters, scores almost the same.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

On the tool-calling benchmark, Omni 2B scores 52, Audio 2B scores 58 and Gemma 4 E4B scores 72; tool calling is a clear weakness of LFM3.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

Under clean audio and mild cafe noise, Audio 2B's word error rate is below 5%; at 10 decibels of noise it rises to 20%, at 5 decibels to 29%, and at 0 decibels it fails 100%.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

In an 11-item transcription test covering phone numbers, invoice numbers, rupee amounts, dates and AI terms, the model got only 5 items right: invoice number, time, quantization, DLLM and Llama.cpp were correct.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

In the smart-home scenario tool-calling test, Audio 2B got 9/10 right and Omni 2B got 10/10 right; both correctly handled negative instructions and multi-action commands, and neither wrongly called tools when it could not complete the task.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

On six math word problems, Audio 2B got 3 right in 10 seconds without reasoning enabled, and got 5 right in 68 seconds with reasoning enabled.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

Among three trap questions (blank license plate, rain-sound transcription, text injection), the model got only one right, exposing the hallucination risk that small models tend to "fill in" rather than refuse when input information is insufficient.

Unverified50%
Nov 4

After 4-bit quantization, running speed is nearly 3 times faster with no drop in transcription quality; Audio's tool calling holds at 9/10, while Omni drops by 1 item; both models can run offline on a laptop, each occupying about 4 GB of memory.

Unverified50%

All Facts (10)

Unverified

Audio 2B accepts text or speech input and outputs text, speech, or both in sync; it supports tool calling, voice chat and reasoning in 18 languages.

50%
Unverified

Omni 2B reuses the audio components and adds a vision encoder, enabling it to process images and video, but it does not have the ability of Audio 2B to "think" before giving a text answer.

50%
Unverified

According to data published by Liquid, Audio 2B has an English word error rate of 6.2 and a VoiceBench score of 73; Gemma 4 E4B, with about four times the parameters, scores almost the same.

50%
Unverified

On the tool-calling benchmark, Omni 2B scores 52, Audio 2B scores 58 and Gemma 4 E4B scores 72; tool calling is a clear weakness of LFM3.

50%
Unverified

Under clean audio and mild cafe noise, Audio 2B's word error rate is below 5%; at 10 decibels of noise it rises to 20%, at 5 decibels to 29%, and at 0 decibels it fails 100%.

50%
Unverified

In an 11-item transcription test covering phone numbers, invoice numbers, rupee amounts, dates and AI terms, the model got only 5 items right: invoice number, time, quantization, DLLM and Llama.cpp were correct.

50%
Unverified

In the smart-home scenario tool-calling test, Audio 2B got 9/10 right and Omni 2B got 10/10 right; both correctly handled negative instructions and multi-action commands, and neither wrongly called tools when it could not complete the task.

50%
Unverified

On six math word problems, Audio 2B got 3 right in 10 seconds without reasoning enabled, and got 5 right in 68 seconds with reasoning enabled.

50%
Unverified

Among three trap questions (blank license plate, rain-sound transcription, text injection), the model got only one right, exposing the hallucination risk that small models tend to "fill in" rather than refuse when input information is insufficient.

50%
Unverified

After 4-bit quantization, running speed is nearly 3 times faster with no drop in transcription quality; Audio's tool calling holds at 9/10, while Omni drops by 1 item; both models can run offline on a laptop, each occupying about 4 GB of memory.

50%

Source Articles