[KongchangAI]
Model

Jev 1.13

A decision model ranked fourth in the S1MB Japanese track.

Timeline (last 90 days)

Oct 19

On the support-ticket cases with JSON Schema strict mode enabled, Jev took 386 ms, Gemini 896 ms, Mistral 1,672 ms, and GPT-5 nano 7,006 ms.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

In one test case, GPT-5.6 Sol cost 32.5 times Jev, and Opus 5 cost 184.9 times Jev.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

Jev's average confidence was 0.979 on clear tickets and dropped to 0.841 on six ambiguous tickets; the direction of the gap is right but the magnitude is small, possibly insufficient to support reliable threshold routing.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

In independent comparison tests, Jev 1.13's average cost per call was $0.0000188, Mistral Small 3.2 cost 1.4 times Jev, and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite cost 1.7 times.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

In the same tests, Jev's median response time was 352 ms, Mistral Small 3.2 was 1,343 ms, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was 877 ms, and GPT-5 nano was 7,504 ms.

Unverified50%
Oct 19

GPT-5 nano's cost per call was 18.3 times Jev's, with the vast majority consumed by reasoning tokens.

Unverified50%
Oct 15

According to officially published data, Nimble-v4-max scores 10.5 points higher than Jev 1.13 on the public Decision Index score.

Expired50%
Oct 13

In a test of 520 verified comments, Jev 1.13 achieved 94.0% accuracy, detected 175/184 pieces of abusive content, falsely flagged 22/336 clean items, had a median latency of 250ms, and cost $0.05 per thousand calls.

Expired50%

All Facts (6)

Source Articles