[KongchangAI]
Benchmark

MemoryBench

A benchmark for evaluating the memory capabilities of AI models.

Core Facts

Timeline (last 90 days)

Oct 19

Meta's MemoryBench checks whether a model can update facts within a single long conversation, but explicitly does not test persistent memory across sessions.

Unverified50%
Oct 15

MemoryBench is a benchmark created by Meta itself, testing recall of key information in multi-turn long conversations of 64K to 100K tokens, with conversations spanning multiple facts and including distractor conversations as well as injected turns that conflict with or update the target details, scored by an LLM judge according to weighted scoring criteria.

Unverified50%
Oct 15

In the MemoryBench table, the scores of the five models are 85.5, 85.6, 79.0, 81.4, and 81.5 respectively, with a gap of only 0.1 points at the top.

Expired50%
Oct 13

In the MemoryBench test, Muse Wonder achieved 85.5% accuracy, exceeding Claude Opus 5.5's 81.5% and GPT-6 Astra's 81.4%.

Expired50%
Oct 13

On MemoryBench, Wonder defeated Fable, Opus, and Astra; on the Artificial Analysis index, Wonder Full ranks second, behind only Opus 5.5.

Expired50%
Oct 12

MemoryBench and the 'Personal Superintelligence Index' are both Meta internal benchmarks using LLM judging, which carry vendor self-evaluation bias.

Unverified50%
Sep 29

Multi-turn conversation configuration addresses the context memory problem, determining how many rounds of historical information an agent can retain during continuous dialogue.

Verified75%

All Facts (4)

Source Articles