Meshy
A company offering commercial 3D generation products, with API services as its core business model. It is one of the principal players in the commercial 3D generation market alongside Tripo and others.
Timeline (last 90 days)
The developer observed that Tripo3D excels at hard-surface props, Meshy is better at clean topology for character models, and Rodin has an advantage in texture quality (single-source experience, for reference only).
When tested with the prompt 'stylized chibi archer', the three engines Tripo3D, Meshy, and Rodin generated different results (a cute low-poly character, a realistic-style mini model, and a completely distorted result), with the differences stemming from each engine's understanding of the prompt and its training data distribution.
The developer built an online web workbench called Trify3D, which can take a prompt or reference image once, call the three engines Tripo3D, Meshy, and Rodin in parallel to generate, and display the results side by side.
SupaVoxel's face model has a subtle seam at the boundary between the bridge of the nose and the cheek, while Meshy has no visible seam.
Both tools did not blur the four right angles of the graduation cap in the top-down view, performing comparably.
Estimated at a standard layout of 32 bytes per corner and 4 bytes per triangle index, Meshy's geometry requires about 61.17 MB of memory and SupaVoxel's about 46.50 MB, a gap of about 14.67 MB.
Under the same crop box and viewpoint, the 586,096 extra triangles in Meshy brought no visible advantage in the face crop comparison.
In the author's independent tests, Meshy scored 59/100 and SupaVoxel scored 89/100, with the scoring difference coming mainly from engineering efficiency rather than the models' visual appearance quality.
The graduation-monkey GLB file generated by Meshy is 69,179,580 bytes, while SupaVoxel's is 11,165,408 bytes; both contain 3 color textures each, and the Meshy file is about 6 times the size of SupaVoxel's.
On a 12 Mbps mobile network, downloading the 69.18 MB Meshy file takes about 46 seconds, while the 11.17 MB SupaVoxel file takes about 7 seconds.
24 more timeline events
All Facts (20)
The developer observed that Tripo3D excels at hard-surface props, Meshy is better at clean topology for character models, and Rodin has an advantage in texture quality (single-source experience, for reference only).
50%UnverifiedMeshy's GLB declares no required extensions, while SupaVoxel's compressed GLB declares EXT_meshopt_compression and KHR_mesh_quantization, requiring a decoder.
50%UnverifiedBoth Meshy and SupaVoxel can export in GLB format, with geometry and images packaged in the same file.
50%UnverifiedIn this test, the Meshy exported model had 779,020 triangles, while SupaVoxel had 1,500,000.
50%UnverifiedIn this test, the Meshy exported model had 424,152 corners, while SupaVoxel had 865,508.
50%UnverifiedAt a height of 120mm, the Meshy model's average edge length was 0.306mm, while SupaVoxel's was 0.295mm.
50%UnverifiedAfter cleanup, both the Meshy and SupaVoxel models are fully closed, with zero open edges, no non-manifold edges, consistent surface orientation, and each being a single connected shell.
50%UnverifiedBefore cleanup, Meshy reported 67,946 loose edges and SupaVoxel reported 225,446, all of which disappeared after merging vertices at the same positions.
50%UnverifiedIn this test, the Meshy exported file size was 27,408,396 bytes, while SupaVoxel's was 9,044,340 bytes.
50%UnverifiedIn this test, Meshy's color image was 1,658,610 bytes and SupaVoxel's was 519,966 bytes, with Meshy having about three times the color data.
50%UnverifiedIn this test, the Meshy model had 419 stretched slender triangles and SupaVoxel had 2,849; Meshy had no degenerate near-zero-area faces, while SupaVoxel had two.
50%UnverifiedThis test did not record failures or retry counts, and Meshy's generation time was not captured, so there is no speed comparison data.
50%UnverifiedUnder the same crop box and viewpoint, the 586,096 extra triangles in Meshy brought no visible advantage in the face crop comparison.
50%UnverifiedThe graduation-monkey files generated by both tools contain zero skeletons and zero animation clips, so they cannot directly blink, wave or speak.
50%UnverifiedSupaVoxel's face model has a subtle seam at the boundary between the bridge of the nose and the cheek, while Meshy has no visible seam.
50%UnverifiedIn the author's independent tests, Meshy scored 59/100 and SupaVoxel scored 89/100, with the scoring difference coming mainly from engineering efficiency rather than the models' visual appearance quality.
50%UnverifiedThe graduation-monkey GLB file generated by Meshy is 69,179,580 bytes, while SupaVoxel's is 11,165,408 bytes; both contain 3 color textures each, and the Meshy file is about 6 times the size of SupaVoxel's.
50%UnverifiedOn a 12 Mbps mobile network, downloading the 69.18 MB Meshy file takes about 46 seconds, while the 11.17 MB SupaVoxel file takes about 7 seconds.
50%UnverifiedThe Meshy model used 2,086,002 triangles and SupaVoxel used 1,499,906 triangles, with Meshy having 586,096 more triangles.
50%UnverifiedMeshy's GLB file has an empty extensions list and can be opened without any decoder; SupaVoxel's compressed file declares two extensions, meshopt and quantization.
50%