OpenReview
An open scholarly peer-review platform jointly developed by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and New York University. It publicly archives papers, reviewer comments, author responses, and discussions in a searchable format, supporting transparent review processes for top-tier venues such as ICLR and NeurIPS.
Core Facts
ICLR adopts an OpenReview mechanism, under which papers, review comments, author responses, and discussions are visible to the entire academic community during specific stages.
ICLR achieves transparency in open peer review through OpenReview
Timeline (last 90 days)
On platforms such as OpenReview, reviewer reputation is a hidden metric that accumulates gradually; conference organizers record whether reviewers submit on time, the length and quality of review comments, and whether they respond to follow-up inquiries from area chairs.
ICLR is known for its 'open review' (OpenReview) mechanism: all submissions, review comments and author responses are public throughout, and anyone can browse and comment.
OpenReview's account system is tied to author identity and institutional email addresses, providing a technical basis for conferences to identify linked accounts.
OpenReview is an open peer review platform widely adopted by current top AI conferences; ICLR has used it fully since 2018, and conferences such as NeurIPS and ICML have gradually followed suit.
ICLR papers become publicly visible to the community as soon as the formal review process begins, which roughly coincides with the point at which reviewers start their work.
OpenReview archives papers, review comments, author responses, and discussion posts in a searchable manner and makes them publicly accessible, allowing anyone to register an account and post public comments.
Some supplementary materials may be accessible only to reviewers and area chairs (ACs), rather than being visible to the entire community.
ICLR adopts an OpenReview mechanism, under which papers, review comments, author responses, and discussions are visible to the entire academic community during specific stages.
OpenReview is an open academic review platform jointly developed by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and New York University.
Under the OpenReview mechanism, supplementary materials submitted alongside a paper are in principle visible to the community simultaneously with the paper, unless access restrictions are set by the platform or conference policy.
11 more timeline events
All Facts (20)
ICLR adopts an OpenReview mechanism, under which papers, review comments, author responses, and discussions are visible to the entire academic community during specific stages.
75%VerifiedICLR achieves transparency in open peer review through OpenReview
75%UnverifiedICLR uses OpenReview's open peer review, where all submitted papers, reviewer comments, author responses, and final decisions are publicly visible, but reviewer identities remain anonymous.
70%UnverifiedOn platforms such as OpenReview, reviewer reputation is a hidden metric that accumulates gradually; conference organizers record whether reviewers submit on time, the length and quality of review comments, and whether they respond to follow-up inquiries from area chairs.
50%UnverifiedICLR is known for its 'open review' (OpenReview) mechanism: all submissions, review comments and author responses are public throughout, and anyone can browse and comment.
50%UnverifiedOpenReview's account system is tied to author identity and institutional email addresses, providing a technical basis for conferences to identify linked accounts.
50%UnverifiedOpenReview is an open peer review platform widely adopted by current top AI conferences; ICLR has used it fully since 2018, and conferences such as NeurIPS and ICML have gradually followed suit.
50%UnverifiedSome supplementary materials may be accessible only to reviewers and area chairs (ACs), rather than being visible to the entire community.
50%UnverifiedOpenReview is an open academic review platform jointly developed by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and New York University.
50%UnverifiedUnder the OpenReview mechanism, supplementary materials submitted alongside a paper are in principle visible to the community simultaneously with the paper, unless access restrictions are set by the platform or conference policy.
50%UnverifiedICLR papers become publicly visible to the community as soon as the formal review process begins, which roughly coincides with the point at which reviewers start their work.
50%UnverifiedOpenReview archives papers, review comments, author responses, and discussion posts in a searchable manner and makes them publicly accessible, allowing anyone to register an account and post public comments.
50%UnverifiedResearchers should rely on notifications from AAAI's official system (such as the CMT or OpenReview platform) rather than community rumors
50%UnverifiedTMLR uses the OpenReview platform for open peer review, making the review process transparent and traceable.
50%UnverifiedConfirming a paper's acceptance status can be done by checking official notification emails, reading the Call for Papers, and logging into the submission system to view detailed information.
50%UnverifiedThe OpenReview platform was founded in 2013 by Andrew McCallum and others from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
50%UnverifiedA study published on OpenReview argues that the reasoning tokens generated by LLMs are fundamentally unrelated to human reasoning.
50%UnverifiedThe OpenReview platform was founded in 2013 by Andrew McCallum and others at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, making submitted papers, review comments, author responses, and final decisions publicly visible.
50%UnverifiedThe OpenReview platform was founded in 2013 by Andrew McCallum and others from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, improving review quality through transparency.
50%UnverifiedICLR is known for its open review process on OpenReview, with a submission deadline of approximately September–October and the conference held in the following spring; all submitted papers, reviews, author responses, and final decisions are publicly visible.
50%