Transparency Report
A formal reporting mechanism through which technology platforms periodically disclose to the public how they handle government data requests, content moderation, copyright takedowns, and export control compliance. The mechanism aims to improve platform governance transparency and public trust.
Timeline (last 90 days)
Academia and civil society organizations have for years called on platforms to disclose the trigger rules and appeal mechanisms of shadowbanning, but to date mainstream platforms still lack a unified transparency reporting standard.
GitHub's transparency reports have been published regularly since 2015.
The content of GitHub's transparency reports is typically divided into three major categories: government data requests, DMCA copyright takedown notices, and export control and sanctions compliance.
Platform transparency reports are the primary public channel through which outside parties can understand Meta's content enforcement actions, and are typically published on a quarterly or annual basis.
All Facts (4)
Academia and civil society organizations have for years called on platforms to disclose the trigger rules and appeal mechanisms of shadowbanning, but to date mainstream platforms still lack a unified transparency reporting standard.
50%UnverifiedGitHub's transparency reports have been published regularly since 2015.
50%UnverifiedThe content of GitHub's transparency reports is typically divided into three major categories: government data requests, DMCA copyright takedown notices, and export control and sanctions compliance.
50%UnverifiedPlatform transparency reports are the primary public channel through which outside parties can understand Meta's content enforcement actions, and are typically published on a quarterly or annual basis.
50%