Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
The author recommends stating each rule only once in a single prompt, scoping generic rules by name, treating examples as things that may be wrong, and diffing old and new versions before release.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe test conditions were: one prompt only, one round of fixes only, with no additional prompts added midway.70% similarUnverifiedValidation rules are billed separately, counted once per extraction based on the number of rules, not by page.68% similarUnverifiedThe author believes this checklist can be checked without any model involvement, and that each question corresponds to a reproducible form of incorrect invocation, so the description changes can be regression tested.66% similarUnverifiedThe author recommends testing a verifier with citations known to be correct before trusting it, and keeping a threshold: if an entry has fewer than four citations that pass verification, it is better to choose the shorter handwritten version.66% similarUnverifiedTo verify whether a rule is in effect, switch to manual mode in a practice copy, temporarily add a prompt rule for the same command, then have it check the repository status; a confirmation dialog is expected to appear (because prompt takes priority over allow)66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1072262API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1072262MCP
get_claim(id=1072262)