Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Of the 29 comments, 27 revised the article, 1 was rejected (the reviewer mislabeled the Sentinel draft date 2026-10-14 as a future date, because the review prompt carried no current date and the model's knowledge cutoff precedes 2026), and 1 was retained (a style objection in the REA article).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSEC's N-PORT field list is generated from the current template and distributed as-is across all historical quarters, so some defined fields may not exist in older files; for example, although the VaR table can be traced back to 2019, it actually only begins to appear from 2022 Q1.61% similarUnverifiedThe author's attempt to maintain just a single notes file broke down after about five days: one session forgot to update it, the next session trusted the stale board, and so it was back to the briefing loop from the beginning.61% similarUnverifiedThe original author omitted the deduplication check in the first version of the workflow and paid the price for it.59% similarUnverifiedThe same version history also records the process of retractions, proof fixes, and clarifications of assumptions.58% similarUnverifiedIf authors intend to resubmit a paper rejected by NeurIPS in a given year to that same year's ICLR, the time window has effectively already closed.58% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1074230API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1074230MCP
get_claim(id=1074230)