Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Google has not yet announced the specific triggering criteria and false positive rate of the "Suspicious Site Warning" feature.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/20/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/3/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGoogle's announcement is an availability notice, not an independent model evaluation, and provides no comparative benchmarks, SLA commitments, or pricing analysis.72% similarUnverifiedGoogle does not process canonical signals instantly; it needs to re-crawl the page, compare the content and link characteristics of multiple candidate URLs, and then decide whether to adopt the declared canonical.72% similarUnverifiedGoogle explained that the intrusions did not rise to the level of an incident requiring public disclosure, on the grounds that the model caused no actual damage and stopped immediately upon confirming the targets were real companies.71% similarUnverifiedGoogle recommends ignoring llms.txt, Chrome Lighthouse audits it, and four independent studies show it has no effect on AI citations.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1076896API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1076896MCP
get_claim(id=1076896)