Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Opening legal knowledge to business departments carries the risk of misinterpretation, so redesigning the intake stage must include boundary design that specifies which questions the system can answer directly and which must be escalated to a human.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/21/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn most enterprise architectures, product decisions are made by management and legal risks are assessed by the legal department, but if an ethical incident occurs after the system goes live, the public and regulators often first direct their questions at who wrote this code.68% similarUnverifiedThe paper proposes a warranted legal generation standard, under which a system should flexibly choose among the following based on warrant relationships: answering directly, narrowing scope, asking clarifying questions, issuing risk warnings, correcting incorrect premises, or declining to answer when there is no basis for doing so.68% similarUnverifiedMixing RULES and FACTS together leads to a concrete risk: the model tends to treat "policy descriptions" as "negotiable space" and, when the customer applies pressure, derives on its own the conclusion that "it can probably be accommodated".67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1082869API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1082869MCP
get_claim(id=1082869)