Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
The uploader published a prompt reprimand written specifically for the AI demanding verification, but it was blocked by the anti-injection rules, and the AI subsequently continued to ignore it.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/25/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/8/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe uploader suggests confirming AI edits one by one in Claude Code rather than enabling "allow all edits for this session", because the AI can still make mistakes, and atomic-level confirmation is an important safeguard for project safety.77% similarUnverifiedTraditional rule- and signature-based defenses are failing, and defenders also need to use AI to accelerate detection, for example by deploying AI-driven anomaly detection systems.75% similarUnverifiedOnce a conversation enters the waiting-for-human state, the AI's autonomous replies should be paused, otherwise the assistant may continue suggesting steps while a human reviews the same issue.75% similarVerifiedIndirect prompt injection can cause AI agents to execute unauthorized operations within the scope of legitimate permissions, rendering traditional permission-checking mechanisms ineffective.73% similarVerifiedAI programming assistants typically lack real-time security verification capabilities when recommending dependencies, which objectively expands the attack surface.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1095397API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1095397MCP
get_claim(id=1095397)