Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
Having the Agent plan first and then write code, and requiring human confirmation at uncertain points, can prevent rework caused by the Agent improvising.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/25/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedDo not assume the Agent understands which operations can be compromised; when designing workflows, irreversible operations should be isolated separately and require human confirmation.78% similarUnverifiedAgent blocking typically occurs when encountering operations that require manual confirmation, such as overwriting existing files, requesting additional permissions, handling ambiguous input, or encountering unexpected errors.77% similarUnverifiedAn agent can be renamed with just a single line of instruction, meaning anyone can inject instructions into the agent, posing a risk of manipulation.77% similarUnverifiedThe author believes that when the model's ability to write code is no longer the bottleneck, the engineering focus shifts to how to verify the agent's output, and Agent Config's answer is to build the checking process into the agent's workflow, making "self-checking" a default action rather than an after-the-fact remedy.75% similarUnverifiedAgent usage practice recommendations: authorize only the specific folders needed for the task, avoiding opening the entire disk; back up important files in advance; revoke permissions after the task is completed.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1097125API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1097125MCP
get_claim(id=1097125)