Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Projects depending on 0.x version packages cannot assume that minor version upgrades are backward compatible, and interface changes should be carefully checked when upgrading to 0.2.0.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/26/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedProjects with a locked ^2.0.0 range dependency will automatically pull version 2.0.27, because patch version upgrades do not require modifications to existing code.77% similarVerifiedAccording to the Semantic Versioning specification, 1.0.3 as a patch version means the update will not introduce breaking changes, and existing projects can safely upgrade.75% similarUnverifiedSince all changes in v1.12.1 are maintenance-related and do not involve interface behavior changes, the upgrade risk is extremely low and developers can upgrade with confidence.75% similarUnverifiedA minor version bump from 0.5.x to 0.6.0 usually implies incompatible changes or relatively large-scale refactoring, not merely bug fixes.75% similarUnverifiedThe Semantic Versioning specification states that packages in the 0.x.y stage may introduce breaking changes in any minor version upgrade, without being subject to the backward compatibility constraints of the major version number74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1098151API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1098151MCP
get_claim(id=1098151)