Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
In the "Tower of Babel" 3D generation test, Gemini 4 showed floating figures, characters stuck motionless, rigid arrangement and problems with water handling, while the figures in GPT 6.1 Sol had clearer design intent and behavioral intent, with overall completion a level higher.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/29/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/27/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the 3D generation test with the "Golden Gate Bridge" prompt, Gemini 4's coherence and 3D texture were good, the water texture was impressive, and the UI was thoughtfully designed; the author considers it on par with or even slightly better than Sonnet 5.5, but GPT 6.1 Sol is superior.75% similarUnverifiedIn the game generation test, the mini-game control system generated by Gemini 4 was "pretty bad", making the gameplay hard to understand, and characters got stuck; by contrast, the game generated by GPT 6.1 Sol was at least playable and characters did not run around everywhere.75% similarUnverifiedGemini 4 can reason through video understanding, precisely locate the cause of failure, and translate corrective solutions into specific bodily instructions such as stance width, arm-swing trajectory, and release timing.75% similarUnverifiedGemini 4 is stunning in 3D scene generation, but it remains a weak point in real physics simulation; if a project depends on precise physical feedback, it is not recommended for direct production use at this stage.75% similarUnverifiedIn the glass villa 3D generation test, the staircase generated by Gemini 4 fit poorly with the walls, and the overall visual effect was not appealing; the version generated by Opus 5.5 was more aesthetically pleasing.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1111596API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1111596MCP
get_claim(id=1111596)