Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
In the 3D generation test with the "Golden Gate Bridge" prompt, Gemini 4's coherence and 3D texture were good, the water texture was impressive, and the UI was thoughtfully designed; the author considers it on par with or even slightly better than Sonnet 5.5, but GPT 6.1 Sol is superior.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/29/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/27/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the "island shelter" 3D generation test, Gemini 4 showed problems such as trees falling in wrong directions and misplaced elements; the author considers this performance "certainly not the best", while Sonnet 5.5 was rich in detail, coherent and more visually appealing.79% similarUnverifiedIn the "Tower of Babel" 3D generation test, Gemini 4 showed floating figures, characters stuck motionless, rigid arrangement and problems with water handling, while the figures in GPT 6.1 Sol had clearer design intent and behavioral intent, with overall completion a level higher.75% similarPartially VerifiedThe test covered four vision models: Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic), Gemini 3 Flash (Google), Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google), and GPT-5.4 nano (OpenAI).72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1111594API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1111594MCP
get_claim(id=1111594)