Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
In the "island shelter" 3D generation test, Gemini 4 showed problems such as trees falling in wrong directions and misplaced elements; the author considers this performance "certainly not the best", while Sonnet 5.5 was rich in detail, coherent and more visually appealing.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/29/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/27/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the 3D generation test with the "Golden Gate Bridge" prompt, Gemini 4's coherence and 3D texture were good, the water texture was impressive, and the UI was thoughtfully designed; the author considers it on par with or even slightly better than Sonnet 5.5, but GPT 6.1 Sol is superior.79% similarUnverifiedIn the glass villa 3D generation test, the staircase generated by Gemini 4 fit poorly with the walls, and the overall visual effect was not appealing; the version generated by Opus 5.5 was more aesthetically pleasing.72% similarUnverifiedIn the "Tower of Babel" 3D generation test, Gemini 4 showed floating figures, characters stuck motionless, rigid arrangement and problems with water handling, while the figures in GPT 6.1 Sol had clearer design intent and behavioral intent, with overall completion a level higher.70% similarUnverifiedGemini 4 could precisely fix the takeoff position after receiving vague feedback, indicating a better grasp of spatial relationships; DeepSeek's rewrite involved a lot of work but did not grasp the core problem.68% similarUnverifiedGemini 4 is stunning in 3D scene generation, but it remains a weak point in real physics simulation; if a project depends on precise physical feedback, it is not recommended for direct production use at this stage.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1111595API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1111595MCP
get_claim(id=1111595)