Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
According to the paper, on 1,756 tasks from nine comparison suites, Kairos solved more tasks under full resource limits than the strongest evaluated planner in each suite, with the differences most pronounced in numeric, temporal, PDDL3, and PDDL+ planning.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/28/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCommon mitigations for runaway recursion include: setting a maximum depth and a maximum total call budget, requiring subtasks to be more specific than the parent task, and introducing an independent validator at each layer to determine whether a deliverable result is already available.68% similarUnverified研究表明，当任务需要超过 5-7 个相互依赖的推理步骤时，模型的错误率会显著上升67% similarUnverifiedThe test's limitations include: the three tasks are a small sample and skew toward front-end coding tasks, not involving large refactors or multi-day migrations; token counts depend heavily on how each tool organizes its agent loop, and a different mix of tasks could change the ratio.66% similarUnverifiedThe limitations the authors list include: the 9% saving is not an order-of-magnitude improvement, the 7 tasks are skewed toward English, there are only three mid-tier judge models, each configuration was run only once, ratio-type estimators such as F1 are not yet supported, and active routing requires the workflow to log probabilities while some production systems lack such logs.66% similarUnverifiedAveraged over 6 deployments (5 or 9 replicas), A-greement reduced average latency by 12.2% and 33.3% versus the fastest baseline on write-intensive and read-intensive workloads, respectively.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1114022API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1114022MCP
get_claim(id=1114022)