Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
VAL's support for PDDL+ continuous process semantics is incomplete, and it disagrees with planner implementations on certain boundary conventions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSingle dedicated planners differ significantly in PDDL coverage, latency, and the meaning of failure, and the meaning of failure is not unified (unsolvable, timeout, and out-of-memory are hard to distinguish).63% similarUnverifiedIn traditional CPS development processes, the persistent improvement pathway that feeds execution results back into design-phase models is in practice often implicit and lacks systematic methodological support.59% similarUnverifiedThe proximity-override model of AGENTS.md and the cumulative-append model of Claude Code are fundamentally different; when both are in effect simultaneously, which file's instructions take precedence is nearly impossible to predict without an explicit declaration.58% similarUnverifiedThe design of DPT suggests that the performance bottleneck of parallel thinking may lie not in an insufficient number of paths, but in insufficient differences among paths.58% similarUnverified模型无关性在工程实践中并非完全透明，不同LLM在提示词格式、上下文窗口长度、函数调用协议及结构化输出能力上均存在差异56% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1114028API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1114028MCP
get_claim(id=1114028)