Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
When an attacker can implant matching sources for 30% of lies, the trust-source routing system actually performs worse than using the verifier alone.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIf there exists a source of trust that an attacker cannot implant, routing contradictory claims to the evidence source for verification can restore legitimate updates, and such a combined system has the lowest contamination rate among learned claims.74% similarUnverifiedWhen internal interfaces are accidentally exposed to the public internet, or credentials that should be kept secret are hardcoded in front-end code, the trust boundary is broken, and attackers can impersonate a trusted internal caller to bypass security checks.73% similarUnverifiedThe core of the trusting-trust attack is to cause a compromised compiler to re-inject malicious logic when compiling itself, so that even if the source code is clean, the compiled compiler still contains a backdoor.72% similarUnverifiedFor privacy protection tools, false negatives (missed detections) lead to irreversible information leakage, while false positives carry a smaller cost; therefore, a fail-safe design bias is more reasonable71% similarUnverifiedThe attack was a combined attack of indirect prompt injection and privilege abuse, with the root cause being incorrect trust assumptions at the architectural level rather than a code bug.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1115517API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1115517MCP
get_claim(id=1115517)