Expired90% confidenceFactTime unknown
arXiv's new policy does not comprehensively prohibit the use of AI tools to assist writing; the core criterion is whether the authors have responsibly reviewed and revised the AI-generated content.
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedICML在2024年的投稿指南中规定作者必须对AI生成的所有内容负责，且不得使用AI生成整篇论文或大段核心内容70% similarUnverified"Yoti" uses manual review rather than AI automated review to control content quality.69% similarVerifiedThe platform adopts a design philosophy of AI generation with human editability, where AI handles the first draft and the final judgment and revision authority is handed over to testers.69% similarUnverifiedAfter AI writing tools became widespread, the em dash was labeled as having an 'AI feel,' and professional human writing habits conversely became evidence of not sounding human.68% similarUnverifiedThe practice more widely accepted in academia is to use AI as an auxiliary tool for polishing, translation, and literature review, with explicit disclosure of AI usage in the paper.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/21721API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/21721MCP
get_claim(id=21721)