Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
The four models participating in the test are QDAM 3.7 Plus, LongCat 2.0, DeepSeek Feast Pro, and MiniMax Mi3.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/9/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/7/2026(expired)
Sources
Domestic Budget AI Models for Web Novel Writing: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Four Models
bilibili灵蟹SoloEnt7/5/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedMeta's Llama 3.1 supports 405B parameters, and open-source models including Qwen2.5 and DeepSeek-V3 have approached or even surpassed some closed-source commercial models on multiple benchmarks.66% similarUnverifiedThe model used in the demonstration is MiniMax M3, not the highest-performing model on the market; the selection criteria were sufficiency and cost reliability.65% similarUnverifiedQwen2.5-3B-Instruct, Phi-3.5-mini (3.8B), and Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct are the three models with the best overall performance at small parameter scales at the end of 2024.64% similarUnverifiedThis test selected five AI models — DeepSeek R1, Claude Sonnet 3.7, ChatGPT o3 Mini, Grok 3, and Tongyi Qianwen 2.5 Max — and used a unified prompt to have each of them generate a runnable web-based Snake game.64% similarUnverifiedAlibaba released a preview of Qwen 3.6 MAX, which outperformed Claude 4.5 Opus and GLM 5.1 on coding tests including SWE Bench Pro and Terminal Bench; it is currently a closed-source model accessible only via Alibaba Cloud API or Qwen Studio.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/329235API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/329235MCP
get_claim(id=329235)