Expired50% confidenceEventExact time
This test selected five AI models — DeepSeek R1, Claude Sonnet 3.7, ChatGPT o3 Mini, Grok 3, and Tongyi Qianwen 2.5 Max — and used a unified prompt to have each of them generate a runnable web-based Snake game.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Five AI Models Tested for Game Development: Which Is Best for Zero-Experience Coding?
bilibiliso-PHI-a_903/1/2025
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn a test of identifying hidden bugs in images, Sonnet 5's Max mode spent approximately 10 minutes and identified all bugs with completely correct results, while Gemini's top-tier model only found 4, and GPT-5.5 X-High failed to detect any.66% similarUnverifiedIn the easy question, GLM 5.1 added 19 lines of tests, Kimi K2.6 added 12 lines, while the other five models (including Sonnet 4.6) wrote zero lines of tests.66% similarUnverifiedV4 Pro Max满血推理模式下算法竞赛3206分、编程93.5分、科学问答90.1分、软件工程80.6分、终端操作67.9分65% similarUnverifiedGLM4 ranks fifth in the World of AI benchmark tool.64% similarUnverifiedThe four models participating in the test are QDAM 3.7 Plus, LongCat 2.0, DeepSeek Feast Pro, and MiniMax Mi3.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/60451API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/60451MCP
get_claim(id=60451)