Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In a Shisen-Sho game test, V4 Pro's connection line logic was normal, while V4 Flash exhibited errors in its connection logic.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the cube unfolding and 3D folding question, both V4.1 Flash and V4 Flash produced blank screens and failed, V4 Pro had a correct unfolding diagram but failed due to incorrect closure logic, and JLM 5.3 Flash performed best.79% similarUnverifiedV4.1 Flash surpasses V4 Pro on agent coding benchmarks and overtakes competing products in the same tier.77% similarUnverifiedV4 Pro automatically switching to V4.1 Flash has raised concerns among developers, potentially affecting the stability and consistency of online businesses that have already integrated the product.76% similarUnverifiedWhen replicating a personal website using the same prompt, V4 Pro significantly outperformed V4 Flash in the fidelity and completeness of front-end styling.75% similarUnverifiedThe Flexible reasoning effort mechanism applies to both the V4-Pro and the lighter V4-Flash versions.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/908331API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/908331MCP
get_claim(id=908331)