Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In an auto-dungeon game test, V4.1 Flash completed the task in a single attempt, while other models typically required at least two attempts.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
9/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 12/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedV4.1 Flash did not lead all models in the charts in another terminal task benchmark.76% similarUnverifiedIn a multi-robot warehouse scheduling simulation system case, V4.1 Flash exhibited a situation where robots froze after being intercepted, with a completion rate below expectations.76% similarUnverifiedV4.1 Flash surpasses V4 Pro on agent coding benchmarks and overtakes competing products in the same tier.75% similarUnverifiedIn a Shisen-Sho game test, V4 Pro's connection line logic was normal, while V4 Flash exhibited errors in its connection logic.70% similarUnverifiedCompared to the old Flash model, V4.1 Flash has more comprehensive capabilities and more accurate recognition, but takes longer and costs more per session.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/908630API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/908630MCP
get_claim(id=908630)