Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The growth in the number of reviewers cannot keep pace with the growth in submission volume, causing a decline in peer review quality.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/13/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedFindings papers go through the same peer review process as main conference papers, but are ranked slightly below the main conference acceptance threshold in the final ranking.65% similarUnverifiedSome researchers have systematically attempted to reproduce papers that passed checklist review and found that the success rate did not improve significantly.65% similarUnverified要求研究者对比投稿截止日期之后才发布的模型是不公平的评审标准64% similarUnverifiedThe results of the NeurIPS 2022 consistency experiment showed that approximately 50% of papers received completely different accept/reject decisions between the two groups of reviewers64% similarUnverifiedThe study found that the faithfulness score for counterfactual inputs was only 0.05 points lower than for factual inputs (on a 1–5 scale), a difference that is almost negligible.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/918544API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/918544MCP
get_claim(id=918544)