Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On a pure parity task, GAN8 achieved 100%, JEV MLP achieved 67%, and JEV linear achieved 33%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/21/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the IID test (21 questions) of the third round's structured combination tasks, GAN8 reached 95.2%, surpassing JEV's manual weights at 76.2%, linear training at 71.4%, and MLP at 85.7%.77% similarUnverifiedThe simple 3-rule baseline used for comparison achieved an accuracy of only 64.4%, with Jev leading by approximately 8 percentage points.65% similarUnverifiedIn the NASA Kepler signal classification test, Jev achieved an overall accuracy of 72.5% across all 8,054 decisions, consistent with NASA archive labels.62% similarUnverifiedMuse Glimmer 30B is reported to achieve 74.9 tokens per second on an RTX 5090, and reviewers observed approximately 60–65 tokens/sec running the full-precision version on an RTX 3090.62% similarUnverifiedIn EvoArena testing, GPT-5.5, which achieved the highest Step Level score, had an accuracy of just over 50%, while Gemini-3.1 Pro and GLM-5.1, which performed best at the Chain Level, reached only approximately 28%–29%.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/939307API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/939307MCP
get_claim(id=939307)