Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The core contributions of a paper should be determined by humans, as having AI summarize the contributions tends to result in increasing deviation the more it summarizes.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/27/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified将核心架构信息、关键约束、模块依赖关系置于提示词前段有助于提升AI理解质量75% similarUnverifiedAI tools should be used with extra caution for unpublished core research results, while their use can be more relaxed for published or non-core content.75% similarUnverifiedModerators take a pragmatic approach to distinguishing 'AI-assisted' from 'AI mass-produced spam,' with the key being whether the content reflects the author's genuine thinking and effort.74% similarUnverifiedThe practice more widely accepted in academia is to use AI as an auxiliary tool for polishing, translation, and literature review, with explicit disclosure of AI usage in the paper.73% similarVerifiedWhen collaborating with AI, the clearer the problem is broken down, the more precise the output AI produces.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/953038API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/953038MCP
get_claim(id=953038)