Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In United States v. Microsoft, the court initially ruled that Microsoft's monopoly was established and that it should be broken up, but after a settlement the remedy was changed to behavioral remedies, requiring Microsoft to open system interfaces to third parties and prohibiting certain exclusive agreements.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/8/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedBe Inc. submitted evidence to the U.S. Department of Justice claiming that Microsoft prevented OEM manufacturers from pre-installing BeOS through exclusive agreements, which became one of the pieces of evidence in the United States v. Microsoft antitrust case.78% similarUnverifiedBetween 1998 and 2001, Microsoft was deeply embroiled in an antitrust lawsuit brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, and the release of Me coincided exactly with this media spotlight period.74% similarUnverifiedAs a US company, Microsoft is required under compliance pressure to restrict services to sanctioned entities, and Dutch institutions related to the ICC as its host country were therefore affected.70% similarUnverified摇杆漂移问题曾引发针对微软、索尼和任天堂的多起集体诉讼67% similarUnverified1998年由20个州联合对微软提起反垄断诉讼62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/986302API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/986302MCP
get_claim(id=986302)