[KongchangAI]
Benchmark

GSM8K

GSM8K is a benchmark comprising approximately 8,500 grade-school-level math word problems, used to evaluate the basic mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models.

Core Facts

Timeline (last 90 days)

Oct 29

Scores on early widely used benchmarks such as MMLU and GSM8K are already highly concentrated in the face of new-generation models.

Unverified50%
Oct 29

Two and a half years ago, when AI labs released a new generation of large language models, almost all of them put GSM8K scores in the most prominent position; today, this metric no longer appears in the core narrative of mainstream model releases.

Unverified50%
Oct 29

When mainstream models' accuracy on GSM8K approaches 95% or above, the benchmark loses its discriminative power.

Unverified50%
Oct 29

The design features of GSM8K are unique answers and automatic scoring, with the aim of testing a model's multi-step chain reasoning rather than mere memorization.

Unverified50%
Oct 27

On GSM8K, dSpark achieves a 10.12x speedup on LLaDA-8B-Instruct relative to multiple baseline methods.

Unverified50%
Oct 27

While achieving speedup on GSM8K, dSpark maintains or even improves task performance.

Unverified50%
Oct 27

The gain from the sampler can be decomposed into a memory effect (present on both Sudoku and GSM8K) and a token-selection effect (present on GSM8K and most pronounced at small budgets).

Unverified50%
Oct 27

On reasoning tasks (such as GSM8K), categorical refinement improves performance, whereas in unconditional text generation, updates that preserve randomness are more conducive to maintaining diversity.

Unverified50%
Oct 26

Traditional evaluations such as MMLU and GSM8K usually only check whether the text of a model's single output is correct, amounting to a static input-output mapping.

Unverified50%
Oct 25

MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval and C-Eval are common large-model benchmark suites, focusing respectively on multidisciplinary knowledge, elementary-school math reasoning, code generation and comprehensive Chinese ability.

Unverified50%

40 more timeline events

All Facts (20)

Verified

MMLU evaluates a model's breadth of knowledge across 57 subject areas, HumanEval measures code generation accuracy, GSM8K tests mathematical reasoning, and HELM constructs a comprehensive multi-dimensional evaluation framework.

90%
Verified

Benchmark testing is an important reference for verifying model capabilities, and common evaluation dimensions include mathematical reasoning, code generation, and scientific question answering.

85%
Verified

Benchmark contamination refers to the phenomenon where test questions may have already appeared in training data, causing high scores to not truly represent generalization ability.

85%
Verified

Standard AI benchmarks include MMLU (a comprehensive knowledge test covering 57 subjects), GPQA (graduate-level professional question answering), SWE-bench (real-world software engineering tasks), HumanEval and MBPP (programming ability), and MATH and GSM8K (mathematical reasoning)

85%
Verified

MMLU contains approximately 15,000 multiple-choice questions across 57 subject areas; HumanEval, designed by OpenAI, contains 164 Python programming problems; MATH contains 12,500 competition math problems; and GPQA covers graduate-level science questions.

80%
Verified

GSM8K is an elementary school math word problem benchmark released by OpenAI in 2021, containing approximately 8,500 problems that require 2 to 8 reasoning steps

80%
Verified

On mainstream evaluations such as MMLU, HumanEval, and GSM8K, the score gaps among leading large models are often only a few percentage points.

80%
Verified

Mainstream benchmarks such as MMLU, HumanEval, and GSM8K were originally designed primarily for academic comparison, focusing on measuring model accuracy on closed-form questions.

75%
Verified

GSM8K, released by OpenAI, contains approximately 8,500 elementary school math word problems designed to test multi-step reasoning ability

75%
Verified

HumanEval was designed by OpenAI and contains 164 Python programming problems; GSM8K contains 8,500 elementary school math word problems; MMLU covers multiple-choice questions across 57 subject areas.

75%
Verified

AI model benchmarking typically evaluates a model's reasoning, coding, and mathematical capabilities on standard datasets such as MMLU, HumanEval, and GSM8K.

70%
Verified

When test questions may have appeared in training data, high scores do not truly represent generalization ability — this is known as benchmark contamination.

65%
Verified

Commonly used AI benchmarks in the industry include MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding), HumanEval (code generation), and GSM8K (mathematical reasoning), but each benchmark can only measure capabilities along specific dimensions.

65%
Verified

MMLU, HumanEval, and MT-Bench are standardized benchmark test sets widely recognized by the AI community.

65%
Unverified

On mainstream benchmarks such as MMLU, HumanEval, and GSM8K, open-source models have reached 85–95% of the level of early versions of GPT-4.

70%
Unverified

Benchmarks for evaluating large models such as MMLU, HumanEval, and GSM8K have limitations including data contamination, overfitting, and insufficient ecological validity.

70%
Unverified

The Self-Consistency method, proposed by Xuezhi Wang and others, improved accuracy by more than 10% on mathematical reasoning benchmarks such as GSM8K.

70%
Partially Verified

GSM8K是小学数学推理基准,HumanEval是代码生成基准,HellaSwag是常识推理基准

65%
Unverified

MMLU covers 57 subjects and nearly 16,000 multiple-choice questions; HumanEval was developed by OpenAI and contains 164 programming problems; GSM8K contains 8,500 elementary school math word problems.

60%
Unverified

HumanEval consists of 164 Python programming problems, and GSM8K contains 8,500 elementary school math word problems.

60%

Source Articles