Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
A commonly used empirical threshold in research fields: κ above 0.8 is regarded as high agreement, and 0.6 to 0.8 as substantial agreement.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the first round of experiments, features with verified capabilities averaged 1.43, while features without verified capabilities averaged 1.14, a negligible gap; after fixing the language issues, the same comparison became 2.00 versus 1.07.69% similarUnverifiedEven experienced human experts performing the same review task often achieve inter-group Kappa values of only 0.4–0.6.67% similarUnverifiedCohen's Kappa coefficient is suitable for scenarios with two reviewers and categorical variables; its value ranges from -1 to 1, and a value above 0.6 is generally considered moderate agreement, while above 0.8 is considered high agreement.67% similarUnverifiedInter-annotator agreement among different human annotators in open-ended text quality assessment is typically only 0.6–0.8.66% similarUnverifiedThe author does not default every LoRA to a strength of 1.0; after testing, the recommended strength for most models ultimately falls in the 0.8–1.2 range.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1066018API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1066018MCP
get_claim(id=1066018)