Verified85% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In 2014, the NeurIPS program committee conducted a review consistency experiment in which approximately 10% (about 166 papers) were reviewed by two independent program committees, and the two groups' acceptance decisions were only approximately 57% consistent.
5
Sources
85%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe results of the NeurIPS 2022 consistency experiment showed that approximately 50% of papers received completely different accept/reject decisions between the two groups of reviewers76% similarUnverifiedFindings papers go through the same peer review process as main conference papers, but are ranked slightly below the main conference acceptance threshold in the final ranking.69% similarUnverifiedNeurIPS主会论文经过双盲同行评审，接收率通常在20-25%之间68% similarUnverifiedAmong the panel of ten LLM reviewers used as the primary reviewer pool in the study, the average pairwise correlation coefficient of reviewer errors was 0.21.67% similarUnverified研究表明同一篇论文在不同审稿人之间的评分差异可达2-3分（满分10分）66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/528493API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/528493MCP
get_claim(id=528493)