Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On Terminal Bench, Beam scored approximately 81 points, ranking last, below DeepSeek's 90.6, Kimi's 88.3, GLM's 88.2, and Qwen's 86.6.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/8/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/22/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn SWE Bench Pro, Glimmer narrowly beat Qwen with 51.2 vs. 50.2, but Qwen surpassed it on SWE Bench Verified (Qwen 77.2 vs. 76) and Terminal Bench (Qwen 60.7 vs. 51.7).66% similarUnverifiedIn the Terminal Bench test, Qwen 3.6 27B scored approximately 60.7, while Muse Glimmer scored only 51.7, falling significantly behind.64% similarUnverifiedAlibaba's official figures show Qwen3.8 Flash scoring 62.5 on SWE-Bench Pro, leading Claude Opus 4.6 by approximately 9 points; 73.9 on Cowork Bench versus DeepSeek's 45.1; and 55.7 on Job Bench, exceeding Opus 4.6 by approximately 20 points.64% similarUnverifiedThe same DeepSeek v1.1 model scored between 69.8% and 74.2% on Terminal Bench 2.0 under different harnesses.61% similarUnverifiedOn Live Code Bench, Qwen3.8-27B scored 90.3 and Claude Opus 4.6 scored 88.8.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/987291API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/987291MCP
get_claim(id=987291)