8 related articles

In-depth comparison of four AI Super Apps — Cursor, Codex, Claude Desktop, and Anti-Gravity — across 11 dimensions to help you find the best AI dev tool.
Using HTML Instead of PPT for Dynamic …
A designer tested using AI-assisted HTML coding in Cursor to create dynamic presentations, cutting 3 days of work to 1 hour. Covers animation, interaction design, and Cursor workflow.

Cursor officially releases its SDK supporting Python and TypeScript, letting developers build custom AI Agents on Composer 2.5. Explore core capabilities, use cases, and a limited 90% discount.
Cursor Composer 2.5 Hands-On: An AI Co…
Hands-on review of Cursor Composer 2.5's Agent view, Plan mode, and right panel features. Coding ability matches Claude and GPT top models at up to 10x lower cost with significantly faster speed.
Cursor 3.0 Deep Dive: The AI Agent Com…
Cursor 3.0 abandons VS Code entirely, rewritten from scratch in Rust as an AI agent management platform. Deep dive into its three evolutions, Composer 2 controversy, parallel agent orchestration, and the paradigm shift from assisted to autonomous coding.
Grok Build vs GPT 5.5 vs Composer 2.5:…
Hands-on comparison of Grok Build 0.1, GPT 5.5, and Composer 2.5 across 17 complex frontend tasks, evaluating code depth, visual quality, requirement coverage, and cost-effectiveness.
Product ReviewsDeep analysis of Cursor 3.0's three core upgrades: Rust rewrite leaving VS Code behind, in-house Composer 2 model with 86% cost reduction, and Agent Windows for multi-agent parallel development.
Product ReviewsDeep dive into Cursor 3.0's major upgrades: proprietary Composer 2 coding model, multi-agent parallel workflows, built-in browser and design mode. Exploring the shift from VS Code fork to Rust rewrite and the AI agent programming paradigm.